<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ulta vs. Sephora</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenhuch.com/2009/07/28/ulta-vs-sephora/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenhuch.com/2009/07/28/ulta-vs-sephora/</link>
	<description>Because beauty industry conversation is more interesting than the news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:23:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheNhuch</title>
		<link>http://www.thenhuch.com/2009/07/28/ulta-vs-sephora/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>TheNhuch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenhuch.com/?p=712#comment-9</guid>
		<description>By the way, if you Google the word cosmetics, ULTA comes first followed by Mary Kay then Sephora in natural search. Sephora pays to be on top.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, if you Google the word cosmetics, ULTA comes first followed by Mary Kay then Sephora in natural search. Sephora pays to be on top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

